Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Conrad from San Antonio's column >>

CONRAD FROM SAN ANTONIO

Home Page
An old codger who finds it hard to tolerate folks who think they are absolutely right.
Articles Posted: 137  Links Seeded: 277
Member Since: 5/2008  Last Seen: 9/08/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Nat'l Day of Prayer: Christians refuse to follow Jesus?

Fri May 8, 2009 8:28 AM EDT
white-house, politics, prayer, obama, jesus, religious-right, national-day-of-prayer
By Conrad from San Antonio

Jesus prays alone

Advertise | AdChoices

A picture on the front page of the San Antonio Express News claimed 500 people were being led in prayer by a preacher on the National Day of Prayer in front of the city hall. What is it the right wing Christians do not understand about these words from Jesus?

Matthew 6.5. "And when you pray, you shall not be like the hypocrites. For they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward.
6. "But you, when you pray, go into your room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly.
7. "But when you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do. For they think that they will be heard for their many words. NKJV

A question in the wake of the "National Day of Prayer" (NDoP): Am I perceiving this correctly? Do we have people claiming to be Christians refusing to do what Jesus taught? And, if so, what could be the "reward" these people have now harvested? No doubt they received applause from those who believe like they do. But Jesus implied that there is no reward coming from God.

For this and other reasons Christians seeking to follow Jesus should avoid public displays of prayer. That includes praying around the flag pole (practiced at some puiblic schools), praying at athletic events, prayers before public meetings, and, yes, praying at the inauguration of the President. Remember, Jesus promises open rewards to those who pray in secret..

It is interesting that on this "National Day of Prayer" President Obama was criticized by the organizers of the NDoP for not inviting them into the White House to hold their religioux ceremony. (For eight years President Bush hosted the event, even leading prayers.) On the other hand a national organization of atheists complained that President Obama signed the proclamation designating the prayer day for the nation.

Following the Day of Prayer, a spokesperson for the NDoP people criticized President Obama for the lack of spiritual faith he had demonstrated by not holding a White House ceremony of prayer. It seems probable to an impartial observer that Obama prefers to do his praying in private. And just as the Pharisees condemned Jesus, the NDoP critics stand ready to condemn any who do not practice their version of religion.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Conrad from San Antonio's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Free Thinkers, Outing Dominionism, Theos Logos
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (110)
Conrad from San Antonio

We all have some measure of hyprocrisy; but, when it is pushed to a national scale, it must be called out.

  • 15 votes
Reply#1 - Fri May 8, 2009 8:34 AM EDT
eriq samson

You do understand that the head of the National Day of Prayer Task Force is ...... James Dobson (his wife is also on the board - in a paid position as well)

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Sat May 9, 2009 1:25 AM EDT
Conrad from San Antonio

Oh yes. Dobson is considered the rock star of conservative evangelical Christians. He refused to endorse McCain for president, until McCain chose Palin as his VP candidate. He attacked Barack Obama, saying he distorted Christian views. 12,000 Christiain ministers signed a petition stating that Dobson did not speak for him. He has been a powerful force for conservative Christianity, even though he is usually further to the right than most conservatives.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Sat May 9, 2009 7:29 AM EDT
Reply
D DeMilo

but isn't this the way with the religious right?

  • 11 votes
Reply#2 - Fri May 8, 2009 8:52 AM EDT
1standlastword

D DeMilo

GW politicized his religion in the vain of the members of the Sandhedrin (falsely pious keepers of Abrahamic Law and not shy about getting into the political business of the state....they tried to high-jack a Roman politician to crucify Jesus)

Evangelical Christianity in America is a political movement. Bush is a Born Again Evangelical Christian; apparently, Obama is not practicing as an Evangelical.

Bush gave the Evangelicals a huge footprint in the political arena. So we are having this debate post Bush because American government is influenced by a Christian lobby that has always been around and will likely always be around.

So, yes sir it is what the Christian Right does...but they aren't calling themselves the Christian Right anymore...sorry I can remember the new label hasn't...stuck with me yet

  • 6 votes
#2.1 - Fri May 8, 2009 12:13 PM EDT
D DeMilo

yep. a new name but the same players. if they were even half as devout as they claim or spewed less hate-filled rhetoric of exclusion and damnation, they would gain credibility

  • 5 votes
#2.2 - Fri May 8, 2009 1:19 PM EDT
Agent 57

didn't this mostly start back with reagan and jerry falwell's moral majority whom reagan courted for votes???

  • 6 votes
#2.3 - Fri May 8, 2009 2:16 PM EDT
1standlastword

Agent57

Billy Graham Sr. started keeping court with American presidents back in the 50's (Truman, Kennedy, Nixon, to name a few) and was truely a bipartisan. He was very popular with the American people and rated in the top ten of most liked people

Graham was a major inspiration in W's conversion from his parents' Episcopilian devotion

  • 4 votes
#2.4 - Fri May 8, 2009 3:54 PM EDT
Agent 57

I forgot about Billy Graham, he was a good man,, and yes bipartisan. He wasn't trying to influence the White House or congress.... wereas the moral majority was more into lobbying.... and pursuing a political agenda.... backing chosen candidates to advance a political agenda....

  • 3 votes
#2.5 - Fri May 8, 2009 6:08 PM EDT
Reply
SnotRag Dave

Do we have people claiming to be Christians refusing to do what Jesus taught?

Absolutely... and they would reject Him today. They have their own interpretations of what it means to follow God... just as those misguided souls of nearly 2,000 years ago who expected a warrior Messiah and turned their backs on a Man of peace.

  • 16 votes
Reply#3 - Fri May 8, 2009 9:06 AM EDT
American Spirit

Christians refuse to follow Jesus?

So what else is new? The religious reich is more concerned about the words of lesser men in their book instead of the actual words of their prophet.

  • 12 votes
Reply#4 - Fri May 8, 2009 9:12 AM EDT
David SchulzeDeleted
GoldenGateMami_Susi

The leaders of NDOP are other Christian conservative groups are li-vid that President Obama did not do as Bush did and invite them in for prayer meetings, lunches, brunches, and schmoozefests.......that he ISN'T A CHRISTIAN because he didnt do that.

Ok, so what......You have to have a NDOP to pray and if you don't participate PUBLICLY you hate God? And if you are the president and do as the LAW STATES proclaim it a NDOP (as Obama did by law) BUT DO NOT INVITE THEM IN FOR TEA........you're a God hater.

Ah huh.

Ok......well let me tell you something.....as a Catholic.....I pray....I pray all live long friggin day.....privately. I don't need YOU or anyone else measuring my devotion to my faith or my GOD by how public I am or not.

If you want to eat, breathe, bathe, crap, piss by the bible go for it. The bible is interpretive text written by HUMANS. God did NOT write the bible. Not everyone sees or uses the bible as a guide to life there are many of us who use it to pray, to reflect, to reference.

This nation is the most pluralistic country in the world. We pray, we chant, we meditate, we write, we sing, we praise, we commune with nature and some people just do not believe, etc. Christianity is NOT the faith of this nation it is ONE of the faiths of this nation.

Obama is NOT Bush. He did his duty as it is prescribed by law. That is all he is entitled to do. It makes him no less Christian or no less faithful or a believer......the key is to pray. I don't think Jesus is going to fault anyone if Obama didn't show up with a bible in one hand and a cup of tea in the other.

  • 7 votes
Reply#6 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:15 AM EDT
teetracie

When one is analyzing scripture, it's very important to remember your hermeneutics. Like David said, one must be VERY careful to not take scripture out of context. That's why we have so many interpretations of the same passage...because people will ignore surrounding text and make it say what they think they should say.

This passage is referring to doing things for the right reasons, and making sure that your heart is in the right place. Here Matthew is saying that the hypocrites will do stuff in public, making sure that everyone sees that they're doing the right thing but in reality their heart could care less about what they're doing/saying. If Christians were called to worship in private all the time, how would they be showing the outward expression of the inward faith? The whole basis of the religion/lifestyle is to show the love of Christ through their actions.

There are definitely Christians (or what I like to call "Sunday Christians") who will go through the motions of Christianity not really ever understanding what it means or fully appreciating what they're doing, they just do it so they'll look good to their peers. These are the hypocrites Matthew is talking about. He's not saying that if you pray over your meal at a public restaurant that you're a hypocrite and aren't worshiping God. If you were doing it to impress others, than yes. But if your heart and intentions are pure, that you want God to bless your food and give Him thanks for it, then there's nothing wrong with that.

And then there are the Christians who take it too far and condemn those that don't believe the same way they do. They are a group of a few, yet all Christians are seen as this because many people are too ignorant to look past the stereotype. Jesus preached on acceptance, tolerance, love, compassion, and service. That's the true basis of the Christian religion. People will take it to extremes to satisfy their own needs and what they think they need out of life. You can't condemn the whole group for the actions of a few, we learn this time and time again with different religious organizations, party affiliations, hell even sports and in your families. Making sure to look at the WHOLE spectrum and not just a piece of it is when you will truly gain perspective.

  • 5 votes
Reply#7 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:16 AM EDT
David SchulzeDeleted
Conrad from San Antonio

Not a reply at all. I expect, now that you two have found this site, that you will continue to bombard us with your comments. Go ahead.

But do not think that your way of interpretating the Scriptures is the only true way either.. It may be true for you. Your interpretation evidently meets your needs and helps you feel holy, or whatever. That's fine.

But when a group of thirty high school kids circle a flag pole and pray, while the other kids are coming to school, are they doing that to be seen by the rest of the school (like the Pharisees praying on the street corners) or are they seeking commnion with God in secret? WWJD? I understand this question can be answered either way.

I an not anti-Christian. I am an ordained minister (retired). I would much prefer to have a church full of people praying in their closet than to have a thousand of them marching down the streed (no matter what the motivation of their heart).

Most often when Jesus prayed he pulled apart from the crowds. He would go off by himself and pray. I know there are a few exceptions, but most of the time he prayed alone. I doubt very seriously he would stage a "pray-in" in the Sanhedrin's courtyard; or even in the courtyard of the Temple in Jerusalem.

I went to a NDoP service last night and saw little evidence of humility and confession of sins. Mostly the service thanked God for making us such a great and free nation. Okay, we are great and free. but we also have many sins and there was little contrition and call for repentance. I don't think Jesus would have been very comfortable or comforting if he had been there.

  • 5 votes
#7.2 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:08 AM EDT
PowerIsKnowledge

# 7- teetracie - If Christians were called to worship in private all the time, how would they be showing the outward expression of the inward faith?

Why would they need to if their sole purpose is to please God who knows and sees everything. Why does a Christian have to prove faith to anyone but God? Wouldn't anything else be showboating!

  • 8 votes
#7.3 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:10 AM EDT
teetracie

Ok first of all I'm going to reply to Conrad.

I expect, now that you two have found this site, that you will continue to bombard us with your comments. Go ahead.

How is this AT ALL showing what this site is about? From what I understand, you come here, see other people's opinions and have discussion to try and gain perspective. It's what I'm doing here. I wanted to comment on something, show another point of view and it's what I did. It's fine if you don't agree with it, I even sometimes have trouble believing it myself. But sarcasm and belittling someone is not taking the high road and proving your point to anyone but yourself. Just because I'm new to this site does not mean I don't have opinions and views that I think others might benefit from. To think you're superior due to your longevity of this site is completely wrong and intolerant. Moving on.

The whole point of hermeneutics, as you know, is interpretation of scripture for oneself. It's fine if you want to take that passage and think of it as you will, I was just trying to make sure that another view was presented as an option.

As a Christian myself, I am extremely uncomfortable with the National Day of Prayer and See You at the Pole and other displays of prayer like that. I do think that many people who come out to those are just trying to be like the Pharisees and show people that they're "doing the right thing." But I'm not about to condemn all of them because there are some who go out and do that to be part of the community and worship together. It's not fair to them.

To PowerIsKnowledge, I'm not saying that a Christian has to prove their faith to anyone but God. But as Christians we are called to worship God through our actions. Worship isn't just prayer or singing, it's doing anything because of the love of God. I can worship him by volunteering. I can worship him by tutoring. I can worship him by working. It's the attitude that people have while doing these things that shows the love of Christ, and that's what I meant.

  • 5 votes
#7.4 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:34 AM EDT
Conrad from San Antonio

#7 teetracie

If Christians were called to worship in private all the time, how would they be showing the outward expression of the inward faith?

How about feeding the hungry, providing clothes to the naked, healing the sick, building homes for the poor, seeking justice throughout the land, so that some day, you could say," When did we do these things to you Lord?" And here Jesus reply, "As you did it to the least of these, you did it unto me."

  • 7 votes
#7.5 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
D DeMilo

to put it simply, we worship through our actions that others might see and follow suit but our prayers are in private, a personal commune with God

  • 3 votes
#7.6 - Fri May 8, 2009 1:32 PM EDT
Metal Guitarist

Regarding 7.5, I find it ironic that so many miss that, as they vote Republican for the sake of warped morals and tell the poor that their problems are their own. I've even been told (by Christians) that my three-year-old niece (who has cerebral palsy) has no right to health care-that it's a privilege.

Again, I wish God never existed because I find more compassion in those who practice Atheism than in those who are religious.

  • 4 votes
#7.7 - Fri May 8, 2009 4:02 PM EDT
Metal Guitarist

A Christian is to demonstrate his faith in how he lives and interacts with others.

  • 5 votes
#7.8 - Fri May 8, 2009 5:12 PM EDT
David SchulzeDeleted
eriq samson

If Christians were called to worship in private all the time, how would they be showing the outward expression of the inward faith?

Matthew 25:35 - 40

For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.'

"Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?'

"The King will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'

..

..

See? That's how Christians are to show their rfaith

  • 3 votes
#7.10 - Sat May 9, 2009 1:34 AM EDT
Reply
Metal Guitarist

Jesus said that the death penalty was immoral when the Sanheidren asked Him about the stoning of a woman who was caught in the act of adultry (when He said that all who pick up the sword die by the sword, He was stating a simple truth. He said that taxes should be paid and He said that His message should not be shoved down the throats of others-which means that "In God We Trust" should be taken off of the money and public prayer should be considered an attempt to incite a riot.

No. Christians do not follow Christ.

  • 8 votes
#8 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:45 AM EDT
teetracie

Ok, so you're going to blame Governmental policies (death penalty, taxes) and money printing on the Christians? Interesting.

So using your logic, if people are peacefully assembled together in front of their congressman's office to show their support for gay marriage legislation, they're doing nothing but trying to entice a riot? Not likely. Christians assembled together for prayer and people peacefully gathering to support or protest are both supporting their own causes and showing their beliefs...you can't say one is ok while condemning the other. It's all or nothing. The double standards don't work on this.

  • 2 votes
#8.1 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:52 AM EDT
Metal Guitarist

You're talking to someone who knows the Bible better than you do because I was born and raised in that nonsense.

Jesus Himself said that Christians should pay their taxes and that Church and State are separate. As per the demonstration against gay marriage in front of their congressman's office...yes. That's disturbing the peace because they are attempting to twist the Constitution against their fellow citizens and they should be arrested for that. Since scientists have found homosexuality in other animals, it's obviously natural for some...just as it's natural for my girlfriend to be a southpaw-yet another thing that the Church considered to be satanic.

As long as we're talking about double standards, let's talk about the centuries of murder which have been committed against entire populations in the name of Christ.

Yeah, that's what I thought...............

  • 8 votes
#8.2 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
Conrad from San Antonio

Okay, MG--
It is obvious you have run into some pain in your religious experience
But, your generaliteis don't hold up.

There are innumerable Christians in the world who do their best to follow Jesus and the world is better off for it.

Likewise there area many who have abused and exploited by religious people who have distorted the teachings of Jesus.

I am sorry for your pain. I recognize that you may never get over it. Most of us who have grown up in the Christian faith have experienced some pain along the way. Whether you ever open your Bible again, or ever go to a church again, is less important than you finding people you can love and trust. I hope you have done that, and I wish the best for y ou.

  • 3 votes
#8.3 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:15 AM EDT
teetracie

I know the Bible as well as you do, sir. I was raised in it and went to a Bible college for two years. Don't assume your superiority over me because you think you're right. True superiority comes from open-mindedness and discussion and willingness to accept others opinions just as that...opinions. I'm not saying what I think is fact, just as you shouldn't think yours is fact either. I'm not trying to convince you or anyone else one way or another as you seem to be shoving your beliefs and thoughts down these readers' throats as truth.

Yes, Jesus did say we should pay our taxes, respect our government, and respect those around us by not making them feel uncomfortable. Both Christians and non-Christians alike cheat the IRS, don't demonstrate peacefully, and make others uncomfortable by shoving their beliefs onto others. Everyone is guilty of this.

I agree with you 100% on your last statement, about killing in the name of Christ. It's disgusting and wrong and completely out of line. Just as it's wrong for a suicide bomber to kill in the name of Allah. Just as it's wrong for people to avenge murders by killing the murderer. But again. You can't blame the WHOLE people for the actions of a few. You can't blame the whole Islamic religion because of 9/11. You're going to find hypocrisy and double standards everywhere. You just need to be careful to not turn that into a stereotype.

  • 3 votes
#8.4 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:19 AM EDT
Conrad from San Antonio

#8.1

Christians assembled together for prayer and people peacefully gathering to support or protest are both supporting their own causes and showing their beliefs...you can't say one is ok while condemning the other. It's all or nothing. The double standards don't work on this.

You are missing the point of the article. It is okay for people to assemble peacefully. that is never questioned.

The issue of this article is whether Christians are going to follow Jesus' teaching about prayer. Do we go in our room (our closet) and pray in secret, or do we gather in front of a City Hall and pray publically? It is clear what Jesus says to do.

We can offer all kinds of interpretations, trying to make Jesus' words bend to our situation and wants. But his words to not change nor go away.

BTW--I pray a blessing before a meal I eat in public, but, neither you nor anyone else would know I was praying--an unpoken word of thanks done with no show for o thers to see.

  • 3 votes
#8.5 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:46 AM EDT
Metal Guitarist

Making generalities is the only way to make the good people step forward. Remember that evil triumphs when good people remain silent.

  • 5 votes
#8.6 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
teetracie

Making generalities is the only way to make the good people step forward. Remember that evil triumphs when good people remain silent.

Ok so the only way to make good people step forward is if I generalize that all atheists are hateful and violent, that all Caucasians are rich and intolerant, that all African-Americans steal, that all Hispanics work for minimum wage? No. That's ignorance.

  • 2 votes
#8.7 - Fri May 8, 2009 12:00 PM EDT
D DeMilo

MG - I disagree with you on one point; public prayer should not be restricted so long as (a) it is not required, forced or coerced; and (b) it is a right enjoyed equally by all regardless of belief or lack of

outlawing religeous practice is no different than nationalizing religeous practice, both are a violation and an afront to the constituion

  • 3 votes
#8.8 - Fri May 8, 2009 1:36 PM EDT
Metal Guitarist

Jesus said that only the hypocrites pray in public.

  • 3 votes
#8.9 - Fri May 8, 2009 5:14 PM EDT
PowerIsKnowledge

#8.4 -teetracie - Both Christians and non-Christians alike cheat the IRS, don't demonstrate peacefully, and make others uncomfortable by shoving their beliefs onto others.

Not true. Christians follow their ten commandants and other teachings. Those who deliberately disobey aren't Christians--they only profess to be.

  • 2 votes
#8.10 - Fri May 8, 2009 6:12 PM EDT
Conrad from San Antonio

I'd be willing to bet (but of course I don't bet) that the real Christians you know tend to think like you do, live like you do, and have the same general faith you have. ??

Boy it's a tough job deciding who is real and who is not. Most folks are willing to let that one sleep until judgment day.

  • 1 vote
#8.11 - Fri May 8, 2009 6:31 PM EDT
PowerIsKnowledge

I'm not a Christian. In fact, I'm not religious at all. Don't need it to define who I am. I do know a lot of people in various faiths and I find far too many who are judgmental, intolerant, jealous, vengeful, petty, angry, unhappy, prejudice, are murderers, sexual predators, liars, thieves, cheats, and untrustworthy. And when they deliberately go against their teachings, they make excuses. No, it's not a tough job deciding who is real a who is not. Real people are those who live to help others, are kind, give encouragement to everyone, generous, and supportive all the time. Since I don't believe there will be a judgment day, I can't respond to that.

Question for you. If your God is good all the time, why would his followers be anything but joyful all the time?

  • 4 votes
#8.12 - Fri May 8, 2009 8:55 PM EDT
Jim Dent

Well said PowerIsKnowledge. I've been arguing that point for years. I consider myself a good person who goes out of his way to help others. I need neither the threat of hell nor the reward of heaven to be this way, I do it because it makes me feel good.

  • 3 votes
#8.13 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:12 PM EDT
goldminor

Power, one of the tenets of Christianity is that we are given free will to live our lives. So it becomes the individuals responsibilty to follow the path. Some followers are mostly joyful, although in this world we live in it is sometimes hard to maintain. We are after all, only human. A good person is good whether he believes in a particular religion or not. Another key concept is that none of us is here to judge the other person, outside of making choices on whom you might associate with in life. Regarding the topic of this article, I think Obama,s choice for private prayer is closer to the correct form. In particular, his choice to not make a public display of prayer which could be interpreted as government sanctioned prayer.

    #8.14 - Sat May 9, 2009 12:37 AM EDT
    PowerIsKnowledge

    8.14 - goldminor - Power, one of the tenets of Christianity is that we are given free will to live our lives. So it becomes the individuals responsibilty to follow the path. Some followers are mostly joyful, although in this world we live in it is sometimes hard to maintain. We are after all, only human.

    Didn't God create man to serve him and only him? Didn't God give man free will as an option to serve him or not to serve him?

    • 1 vote
    #8.15 - Sat May 9, 2009 5:17 AM EDT
    goldminor

    The free will to choose right from wrong or the path you choose to walk in life. As to why he created us, I do not know his thoughts outside of what I have been taught and some wisdom that I have gained from my personal search for understanding. I was raised in a Catholic family, which would be a very different set of rules then being raised by fundamentalists. I was naturally drawn to search for deeper understanding and purpose within the Church. I was an altar boy for most of grade school. However, in the 7th grade, when it came time to receive the sacrament of Confirmation, I became aware that what I was searching for would have to be found elsewhere. This was not a loss of faith in the Catholic Church, simply a need for me to find additional answers.

      #8.16 - Sat May 9, 2009 7:56 PM EDT
      Conrad from San Antonio

      #8.12 PiK

      Sorry to be so late coming back. I overlooked your question earlier.

      Question for you. If your God is good all the time, why would his followers be anything but joyful all the time?

      Re God, let me say briefly:

      • "God" is a mystery. We cannot "know" anything about God using our perceptive tools.
      • We can attribute characteristics to "God" from our experiences of what we believe are God's presence.* These attributes are faith statements. When we attribute adjectives to God, e.g. "good" or "bad" we are simply stating something we have come to believe about God from our experiences of God's "consequences" but belief is not knowledge.
      • If I said that God was good all the time, I misspoke. In the essence of God, it is my belief that "good" and "bad" are not existent: only mystery.

      I do not argue that these statements are "factual" or "natural". They are statements of faith. They can be discounted for a number of reasons; but they remain, for me. I ask no one else to believe them.

      Other words besides "God" have been used throughout all time to point to this mystery. Unfortunately the word we use now, "God", carries a lot of unnecessary baggage.

      The answer to the joyful followers question seems self-evident.
      - - - - -
      *By "consequence" I mean an after effect of what is believed to be the presence of God: just as a sonic boom can be heard, after a supesonic jet has left the visual range of the sky, the perceived consequences of God's presence (recognized by faith) can be perceived. Otto called this the mysterium tremendum or the numinous.

      • 2 votes
      #8.17 - Sun May 10, 2009 8:13 PM EDT
      Reply
      Metal Guitarist

      The best kind of faith is none.

      • 6 votes
      Reply#9 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:59 AM EDT
      teetracie

      To each his own. Just be careful to not criticize or condemn those who believe differently from you. Then you're no better than what you accuse them of being.

      • 5 votes
      #9.1 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:01 AM EDT
      Metal Guitarist

      Oh, really?

      Don't the Republicans do that to everyone else? I'll just give them a taste of their own medicine. I'll give a right-wing religious fundamentalist twice the portion that he gave me.

      • 7 votes
      #9.2 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:10 AM EDT
      teetracie

      Yes, and so do the democrats. In March in Missouri there was a report called the MIAC Report that was released to Missouri law enforcement saying that anyone who supported Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, or Bob Barr, or who was against the North American Union, New World Order, the Federal Reserve, or even Barack Obama himself was a right wing extremist and a potential militia member. The people whose platform is based on peace and restoring the Constitution are seen as threats to national security.

      We see it from all sides of the spectrum. The fact that the government isn't willing to accept diversity of beliefs amongst its citizens is a direct violation of the Constitution, whether said government is democratic or republican.

      I'm sorry for your horrible past and experience with religion. It's something many people go through. But your hatred and bitterness towards it is stopping you from seeing things clearly and taking in someone else's point of view as an option. It's dangerous and makes you as close minded as you accuse others of being.

      • 4 votes
      #9.3 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:25 AM EDT
      ditchdigger

      your life must be as worthless as.joy behar,o'reilly,bill mahar,hanity,and a hole lot more sad people.

        #9.4 - Fri May 8, 2009 1:48 PM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        That's a very Christ-like statement, ditchdigger. Thank you for advocating my point.

        • 3 votes
        #9.5 - Fri May 8, 2009 4:08 PM EDT
        Reply
        Metal Guitarist

        God is dead. You know that, right?

        • 3 votes
        Reply#10 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:12 AM EDT
        Conrad from San Antonio

        Yeah, I went through the God is dead thing when I was in seminary. Finally I interpreted that to mean that the Christian understanding of God was dead.

        Now, I have difficulty saying what God is, beyond saying God is a mystery. Of course I can say many things I believe about God, but theyare only beliefs.

        Of course you may be saying God is dead, for you. Another person says God is alive.

        So? Surely you dont require that everyone think like you do in order for them to be right.

        Peace.

        • 4 votes
        #10.1 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:20 AM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        I have no difficulty in saying what God was-a hypocrite and a liar who had no intention of granting promises-see Abraham.

        • 5 votes
        #10.2 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:25 AM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        I used to be a Christian-until it nearly killed me.

        • 4 votes
        #10.3 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:26 AM EDT
        SnotRag Dave

        MG... does my faith hinder you in any way?

        You are free to believe or not believe in the manner you choose.

        If I don't judge you, do you agree to not condemn me?

        I say God is not dead, and true Christians follow the teachings to the best of their ability.

        YES... evil deeds have occurred in the name of religion... all religions... but that doesn't mean that the evildoers did such because of their faith. Rather, they committed atrocities in spite of any faith.

        • 5 votes
        #10.4 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:35 AM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        I used to believe the Bible-now I read it only to find the discrepancies-which are plenty when you consider the fact that times have changed.

        • 1 vote
        #10.5 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:40 AM EDT
        SnotRag Dave

        Perhaps... you read it to force arguments.

        • 4 votes
        #10.6 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:49 AM EDT
        Conrad from San Antonio

        #10.5 MG

        Sounds like you are just fueling your hurt and hate. That's unlikely to give you the prospect of much joy and peace in your life.

        Also, you are not likely to find relief for your issues here on newsvine. Rather, your attitude is going to result in even more argument and hurtful language.

        It would be helpful for you to find a good counselor and go to work on your anger.

        You don't have to go through life with these hurts.

        Good luck.

        • 5 votes
        #10.7 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:56 AM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        Religious faith of any kind hinder entire populations-see the Middle East.

        • 2 votes
        #10.8 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:57 AM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        M

        O

        N

        E

        Y

        • 1 vote
        #10.9 - Fri May 8, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
        pleasecometoyoursenses

        Metal

        And what are all these discrepancies you have found in the Bible?

        • 1 vote
        #10.10 - Fri May 8, 2009 12:35 PM EDT
        Sgt. Pepper

        For someone of no religious faith Metal, you certainly are persistent in wanting others to believe what you believe.

        Almost as if you follow atheism religiously.

        • 1 vote
        #10.11 - Fri May 8, 2009 2:38 PM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        I wish atheism were true. However, I regret to inform you that it isn't. Someone is maintaining the Universe, but He's asleep at the switch when children get abused.

        • 1 vote
        #10.12 - Fri May 8, 2009 3:51 PM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        Let's see....it's wrong to kill, but it's okay to kill your children if they talk back (see Leviticus and Deuteronomy).

        Paul allegedly states that homosexuality is wrong, but admits to having a thorn in his flesh.

        • 3 votes
        #10.13 - Fri May 8, 2009 3:57 PM EDT
        Metal Guitarist

        The Bible also advocates slavery and tells slaves not to rebel against cruel masters, but to submit with fear and trembling.

        I don't think so.

        I'm a free man. I submit to no God or any other slavemaster (Ephesians 6:5-6).

        • 2 votes
        #10.14 - Fri May 8, 2009 4:13 PM EDT
        Reply
        Kaiji

        Ooo there's nothing a hypocrite hates more than to be exposed as one. I expect there will be sparks.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#11 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:15 AM EDT
        Conrad from San Antonio

        Most of us, hypocrits all, have found ways to rationalize who we are. Self-justification. We all do it.

        Getting in touch with our "shadow self" is a big step in shedding some of our hypocrisy.

        • 4 votes
        #11.1 - Fri May 8, 2009 11:24 AM EDT
        Reply
        ditchdigger

        your comment is thinly veiled.you really do not want this day of prayer at all.i agree matthew had it right that is what jesus said to the pharises.while the right wings,sure have their share of pharises,as does the left,and the athiests.i will go to my room in private,and pray for you.oh!by the way."where ever two or more are gathered in my name,there so shall i be"

        • 1 vote
        Reply#12 - Fri May 8, 2009 1:44 PM EDT
        Sword Of ApocalypseDeleted
        Joe-392005

        I went to a NDoP service last night and saw little evidence of humility and confession of sins. Mostly the service thanked God for making us such a great and free nation. Okay, we are great and free. but we also have many sins and there was little contrition and call for repentance.

        The sad part of this statement is you found what you were seeking. If you were there by the leadership of the Spirit, you would have found something more gratifying.You sought something to criticize and that is what you found. How SAD.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#14 - Fri May 8, 2009 3:18 PM EDT
        Martin Westenfelder

        Ok, 500 people chose National Day of Prayer for a political statement.

        I have no problem with that but I hope for them they took also advantage of the day to actually pray.

        Else, what a lost opportunity.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#15 - Fri May 8, 2009 3:27 PM EDT
        T Bourlon

        Conrad, you are entitled to your OPINION as to what those scriptures say, and in a way I agree with you that the National Day of Prayer people were more interested in an agenda than the actual prayer. HOWEVER, I would not put a group of high school kids at a flagpole in the same league. I think you really don't quite get what Jesus was saying. We really don't have to pray in a closet, we can pray anywhere. The point Jesus was making was not to make a big PRODUCTION out of it. The point is to pray for the sake of praying, not just to be seen praying. If we take your opinion on the scriptures to its logical conclusion, then there should never be a prayer service in a Church. That's ridiculous, as Jesus taught the Lord's prayer in a group setting. Of course, that's MY opinion, and I could be just as wrong as I think YOU are. That could explain why there are so many Christian denominations, I've heard as many as 4,000, and they all read the same book, worship the same GOD, and don't agree on much of anything else.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#16 - Fri May 8, 2009 3:31 PM EDT
        Joe-392005

        Conrad

        Two questions if I may. Did you write this article to glorify God or seek the praise of men?

        Second, you state you are a retired minister. Did you pastor a Church? If so did you have or have you ever prayed a public prayer in your Church. If you did then I believe you owe everybody here an apology for you have contradicted by your own actions the whole precept of this article which brings me back to my first question.

          Reply#17 - Fri May 8, 2009 4:03 PM EDT
          Conrad from San Antonio

          I consider a church sanctuary to be a private room.
          When twenty people gather to pray in a private setting, I am in favor of that.
          When twenty people get out on the sidewalk, praying loudly, I condemn that.
          I certainly did not write this article to seek praise from others. I knew the conservative/fundamentalistic people would not agree with me;but I do believe deepening one's spiritual journey involves private prayer.

          TB:

          We really don't have to pray in a closet, we can pray anywhere. The point Jesus was making was not to make a big PRODUCTION out of it.

          OK, that's good. I do think the NDoP was a big production--with bulletin covers, pamphlets, tee shirts,banners, newspaper advertisements, TV spots, etc. for sale to a national audience.

          I do my best to pray continuously. But I certainly do not want to make a show of it.

          Peace.

          • 2 votes
          #17.1 - Fri May 8, 2009 5:58 PM EDT
          Metal Guitarist

          I think Conrad meant well when he wrote this article. Through his answers, I am also inclined to believe he (unlike most Christians) might actually be trying to do the right thing. While I might not agree with everything he is stating, I respect his candor and his attempt to please his God.

          • 2 votes
          #17.2 - Sat May 9, 2009 12:58 PM EDT
          Reply
          Metal Guitarist

          That's how some see it-and that's up to them. I only try to educate people.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#18 - Fri May 8, 2009 5:04 PM EDT
          Sword Of ApocalypseDeleted
          Metal Guitarist

          Since I was raised in that nonsense, I know everything about it. By quoting that verse, you seem to advocate my point-that God condones murder in His name, child abuse and illegal wars.

          Let me ask you this: Do you believe that God spoke to George W. Bush and told him to go to war in Iraq? If so, wouldn't we have won?

          • 2 votes
          #18.2 - Fri May 8, 2009 5:45 PM EDT
          Sword Of ApocalypseDeleted
          Metal Guitarist

          Free will is a load of crap-and I will prove it right now: Mark 14:30 and Matthew 26:34. Peter was destined to deny Christ-and there wasn't a thing he could do about it. It was set in stone.

          • 2 votes
          #18.4 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:27 PM EDT
          Martin Westenfelder

          Do you believe that God spoke to George W. Bush and told him to go to war in Iraq? If so, wouldn't we have won?

          Why not?

          Maybe God thought suberbia was too awash in the US and a good spanking was at the order of the day.

          • 1 vote
          #18.5 - Sat May 9, 2009 6:21 AM EDT
          Sword Of ApocalypseDeleted
          Conrad from San Antonio

          SoA--
          the debate between Calvinistic predestination and the Armenian "free will" has been going on for centuries. Your position is just one side of that debate.

          So, I think you can be a little more gracious in your condemnations. Your views are choices you have made and have no more credence than the opposite views.

          So, cool it, out of respect for others.

          • 3 votes
          #18.7 - Mon May 11, 2009 11:59 AM EDT
          jennincincy

          I agree with Conrad. It is not OUR interpretation that matters. It's what was intended, and I'm not totally convinced the Bible has all the answers... just my .02 worth, which, with inflation isn't much... lol!

            #18.8 - Mon May 11, 2009 9:36 PM EDT
            Conrad from San Antonio

            Well, I think it is our interpretations that matter, to us. Since I believe that all truth is relative. We may have different interpretations (views) as to what a source (scriptures) say; and, difference equals relativity. But what really matters is the way we treat each other.

            • 1 vote
            #18.9 - Tue May 12, 2009 8:03 AM EDT
            jennincincy

            So true, Conrad. Far better said than what I said.

              #18.10 - Wed May 13, 2009 7:05 PM EDT
              Reply
              Joe-392005

              Let me ask you this: Do you believe that God spoke to George W. Bush and told him to go to war in Iraq? If so, wouldn't we have won?

              We already have unless of course Obama screws it up. Anyway whose to say he didn't?

                Reply#19 - Fri May 8, 2009 5:55 PM EDT
                Conrad from San Antonio

                the Prince of Peace might have a word about that.

                • 1 vote
                #19.1 - Fri May 8, 2009 5:59 PM EDT
                Metal Guitarist

                Ah! Another post from the 21% club.

                We lost the Iraq War a long time ago and that country is quickly becoming another Iran-which means God didn't say a God damn word to that drunk.

                God doesn't speak to anyone, as He has better things to do.

                • 1 vote
                #19.2 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:33 PM EDT
                Reply
                Joe-392005

                I consider a church sanctuary to be a private room. When twenty people gather to pray in a private setting, I am in favor of that.

                What about a city hall or does the building matter. Also did you pray at the meeting last night? Of the prayers lifted up were there any condemnations of the government or were they praying for the leaders to seek God and his wisdom as they prayed? If the latter, do you not think God heard those prayers? You have left yourself open to a lot of unanswered questions concerning your own precept of prayer.

                the Prince of Peace might have a word about that.

                Yes as well as He that cometh on a white horse in Rev. 19

                  Reply#20 - Fri May 8, 2009 6:28 PM EDT
                  Besibug-561369

                  This is just another thread to bash Christians - sad.

                    Reply#21 - Fri May 8, 2009 8:14 PM EDT
                    Metal Guitarist

                    I used to be a Christian-and then I grew up. Of course, being ostracized when I was a kid gave me a little push.

                    A word of advice: Practice what you preach and people will flock to you. The reason why you have a persecution complex is because of hypocrites like Rev. Ted Haggard, Jim Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart, David Vitter, Larry Craig and the rest of the boys.

                    It's also a good idea not to judge people who are hurting, but to help them instead.

                    • 1 vote
                    #21.1 - Fri May 8, 2009 10:42 PM EDT
                    Besibug-561369

                    Metal Guitarist - I'm sorry you were ostracized as a kid - children can be cruel no matter the reason for it.

                    The reason I say this thread is just another bash fest on Christians is that I have read the newsvine seeds long enough to know that many Christian haters post such threads to vent their venom and little else. Thus, I call it as I see "it's fruit."

                    Before I became a christian, I didn't like hypocracy, and now that I am a christian, I still dislike it, but I know that the only answer is a life changing relationship with Christ as personal Savior.

                      #21.2 - Sat May 9, 2009 12:50 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      moonstream1Deleted
                      Conrad from San Antonio

                      MG--
                      I have no respect for such an image of God either. I don't think of God that way at all. Trying to explain evil is one of the hardest things I am dealing with myself. But, I don't blame God for its presence. But then I'm not willing, at this time, to say that God created the universe. I'll probably move toward that at some point. But not now. No doubt bad things are present. And if God is responsible for life-giving rain, then God is responsible for life-destructtive hurricanes and tornadoes.

                      Anyway, I'd like to share more with you. If you are interested, go to Theos Logos a public group on newsvine.

                      Or you might be interested in a new article I have posted in the last hour: "I Was, But Am No Longer A Christian, because". . . .

                      All this stuff can be found at the link above.

                      Peace.

                      sometimes I mess up the link business. If the above link does not work, just go to "Groups" on you home page black bar and search for Theos Logos. --ca

                        Reply#23 - Sat May 9, 2009 1:50 PM EDT
                        Conrad from San Antonio

                        PiK--

                        If all you Christians read from the same Bible then the interpretation should be the same. How can you interpret the 10 commandments differently? How can you interpret any of the Bible stories differently? I should be able to walk into any Christian Church and be taught the same message. Unfortunately, all I heard was hell and damnation, and fire and brimstone

                        Three different people observing the same accident may very well have three different interpretations as to what happened.

                        I fear your expectations regarding receiving the same message from every church is unrealistic. Unfortunately churches have different understandings of religious authority. Political parties the same. Auto manufacturers the same.

                        Christian theology is grounded in individual human needs, different cultures, different experiences. For example, you went to a chuirch and heard hell and damnation. I can't remember ever hearing such a message in churches I have attended. Of course if condemnation is what I expect to hear in church, it will be difficult for me to receive a message of forgiveness and love.

                        Your experience, as I understand it, is found in many churches; and that is a shame to Christianity. While God's judgment must be heard, God's love and grace are even more important. I think the message one hears at church has a lot to do with the experiences and the culture of the preacher and the congregation--plus the same background on the part of the listener.

                        I feel apologetic for the abuse your received. The memory is painful I am sure.

                        • 1 vote
                        #23.1 - Sat May 9, 2009 11:37 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        PowerIsKnowledge

                        23.1 - I feel apologetic for the abuse your received. The memory is painful I am sure.

                        Conrad, there you go again making assumptions. Where did I write I was abused in the Church and have painful memories?

                          Reply#24 - Sun May 10, 2009 6:07 AM EDT
                          goldminor

                          He might have been thinking of Metal Guitarist.

                          • 1 vote
                          #24.1 - Sun May 10, 2009 7:28 AM EDT
                          PowerIsKnowledge

                          Thanks goldminor.

                            #24.2 - Sun May 10, 2009 7:55 AM EDT
                            Conrad from San Antonio

                            No, I admit, I do assume more than I should
                            I thought that sitting through hell and brimstone sermons would be abusive.
                            Not?

                            • 1 vote
                            #24.3 - Sun May 10, 2009 9:40 AM EDT
                            PowerIsKnowledge

                            The sermons weren't abusive at all. They taught me that Christianity and religion is not truth.

                            • 1 vote
                            #24.4 - Sun May 10, 2009 2:52 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            goldminor

                            Back in the mid 90's, my son and his young girlfriend wanted to leave Colorado so that they could be together. He asked me if they could come out and stay with me. I agreed rather then having them go out on their own with little resources to get by. She had been raised by her momi who was a fundementalist and took them on Sundays to a fire and brimstone church setting. This had turned the young girl to a negative stance on church people. Particularly, when the pastor had stood her up in front of the congregation and lambasted her for some supposed wrong that she had done. While they lived with me, I occasionally talked to them about my religious upbringing and got them to attend Catholic services a few times to help them understand a different viewpoint of religion. Today, they are back in Colorado and have four children, where they have found a church suitable for them and are raising their children in a good Christian structure. I am very grateful that they took to heart my low keyed words and on their own have established religious values within their family.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#25 - Sun May 10, 2009 2:34 PM EDT
                            mekanicc67

                            hi Conrad

                            I would like to make a comment on the original article. Public prayer is a tricky topic to broach but here it goes. I believe it depends on your motives. You mention the Pharisses they prayed to bring the spotlight on to themselves which was wrong. To me prayer is a conversation between myself and God but at times may include others in this conversation. I believe God does want us to communicate with him more than most of us do or should. I agree though that prayer shouldn't be a show the spotlight should always be on God.

                            thanks & God bless

                            Brian

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#26 - Wed May 13, 2009 2:42 AM EDT
                            Leave a Comment:
                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                            Newsvine Privacy Statement
                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                            FUN STUFF:
                            • Leaderboard |
                            • E-Mail Alerts |
                            • Top of the Vine |
                            • Newsvine Live |
                            • Newsvine Archives |
                            • The Greenhouse |
                            COMPANY STUFF:
                            • Code of Honor |
                            • Company Info |
                            • Contact Us |
                            • Jobs |
                            • User Agreement |
                            • Privacy Policy |
                            • About our ads
                            LEGAL STUFF:
                            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com